So-so. Just okay. Not great, but not terrible. An average film. I've seen better and I've seen worse. Maybe you'll like it, maybe you won't.
- 08.November.2010
- |
- by: cyneben
- cyneben rated this movie
4/10Disappointing
So-so. Just okay. Not great, but not terrible. An average film. I've seen better and I've seen worse. Maybe you'll like it, maybe you won't.
- 08.November.2010
- |
- by: cyneben
What did you think about this review?
Thank you for voting.
Abuse report sent
Report abuse
Close
|
It was ok...
Well, I was expecting more from a film featuring Norton on two characters. The overall outcome was a nice film but definitely not something to write home about.
- 04.April.2010
- |
- by: dddrak
- dddrak rated this movie5/10So-so
It was ok...
Well, I was expecting more from a film featuring Norton on two characters. The overall outcome was a nice film but definitely not something to write home about.
- 04.April.2010
- |
- by: dddrak
What did you think about this review?
Thank you for voting.
Abuse report sent
Report abuse
Close
|
You can't really go wrong with Edward Norton
Ed Norton has no bad films, so you can't really go wrong. Always playing a complicated part in his film, playing two twins mustn't have been really hard for Norton. And if it was you won't notice. Norton is pulling it off, stealing this show, in a...
- 04.April.2010
- |
- by: ccaprica
- ccaprica rated this movie
8/10Great
You can't really go wrong with Edward Norton
Ed Norton has no bad films, so you can't really go wrong. Always playing a complicated part in his film, playing two twins mustn't have been really hard for Norton. And if it was you won't notice. Norton is pulling it off, stealing this show, in a film that even without him was pretty good, involving the right amount of thrilling and amusing.
- 04.April.2010
- |
- by: ccaprica
What did you think about this review?
Thank you for voting.
Abuse report sent
Report abuse
Close
|